The Supreme Court upheld an Oregon city’s ban on camping on public property.
In City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, the Supreme Court held 6-3 that “the enforcement of generally applicable laws regulating camping on public property does not constitute ‘cruel and unusual punishment’ prohibited by the Eighth Amendment.” The case stems from a ban on camping or sleeping on public property instituted by the city of Grants Pass, Oregon, in an effort to address homelessness, which presses violators with starting fines of $295.
The Ninth Circuit previously held in Martin v. City of Boise that anti-camping ordinances violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of “cruel and unusual punishment” when they impose penalties on homeless individuals with nowhere else to go. (RELATED: Supreme Court Agrees To Take Up Red State Ban On Child Sex Change Procedures)
The appeals court rejected the Grants Pass law on the same basis, holding that the Eighth Amendment prevents the city from enforcing its law against homeless individuals for “the mere act of sleeping outside with rudimentary protection from the elements, or for sleeping in their car at night, when there is no other place in the City for them to go.”
This is a breaking news story and will be updated.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].