The CEO of the Gateway Pundit newspaper, Jim Hoft, leveled serious accusations regarding what he described as a long-running scheme involving the abuse of public funds tied to state programs operated from private homes. According to the claims, the system would have allowed individuals to register to receive government resources under the guise of providing childcare services, with little oversight, generating steady income over many years with minimal controls.
The model described would encourage mothers to enroll, remain at home, deduct expenses, and receive additional government money. If sustained for nearly two decades, this scheme would have proven highly lucrative for certain beneficiaries, with amounts reaching into the millions of dollars at the state level.
In that context, Hoft referenced the case of Michael Byrd, the officer who shot Ashli Babbitt, suggesting that the officer’s property does not align with what would be expected from his apparent economic profile. These observations have fueled suspicions of disproportionate income and a lack of accountability, although no documentary evidence was presented during the remarks.
He also mentioned reports describing the alleged transfer of large sums of cash from U.S. airports to Europe and later to Somalia, claiming that these funds may have originated from state agencies. Such accounts have been described as alarming and have intensified calls for a thorough investigation to clarify the destination of public money.
These claims particularly raise questions about how some individuals could have received substantial payments for 17 or 18 years while operating from their homes, without visible infrastructure and with only a small number of children under their care. The central question remains how it is possible to receive such large amounts of money for so long under those conditions.
The accusations add to a broader debate about transparency and oversight in social programs, as well as the need for independent audits. So far, there has been no official response from authorities, leaving the claims in the realm of public allegations pending verification.
