Lefist Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson Says She is ‘Prepared’ to Rule on a Disputed Presidential Election

Supreme Court Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson has said she is preparing herself to rule on the outcome of a disputed presidential election.

In an interview with CBS’s Norah O’Donnell, Jackson said the court must be prepared for such an outcome.

“I think there are legal issues that arise out of the political process,” Jackson said during an interview with CBS’s Norah O’Donnell. “And so, the Supreme Court has to be prepared to respond — if — if that should be necessary.”

O’Donnell then asked Jackson point blank whether she was personally prepared for a Supreme Court ruling.

“As prepared as anyone can be,” Jackson responded. “Let me ask you, are you prepared for all of the news cycles that you’re getting as a result of this election?”

“Um, no,” O’Donnell responded.

Jackson was also asked to weigh in on her recent dissent against a court ruling that gave Donald Trump immunity for official acts he undertook as president, in what was undoubtedly a major legal victory for the former president.

“I was concerned about a system that appeared to provide immunity for one individual under one set of circumstances, when we have a criminal justice system that had ordinarily treated everyone the same,” Jackson explained.

EXCLUSIVE We sit down for a history-making interview with Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. In her first interview since joining the nation’s highest court, we speak to Justice Jackson about her personal journey to the bench, presidential immunity, an enforceable… pic.twitter.com/daZcu8Ps3b

— Norah O’Donnell (@NorahODonnell) August 27, 2024

While one can never say for sure how a Supreme Court justice will vote on a certain issue, Jackson’s loyalty to the Biden regime and her position on the leftist wing of the court means she would be likely to side with the Harris campaign in any electoral dispute.

Following the 2020 presidential election, in which the Democratic Party engaged in massive, widespread voter fraud, the Supreme Court declined to hear the overwhelming evidence that would have given Donald Trump a second term in office.