Trump Promises to Allocate Tariff Revenues to Bail Out U.S. Farmers
Amid a climate of trade tensions and debates over the economic future of the United States, Donald Trump assured that part of the revenues collected from tariffs will be redirected to support farmers.
During a meeting in the Oval Office, accompanied by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, the Republican acknowledged that his trade policies could initially affect agricultural producers, which would justify the implementation of a compensation plan.
“We’re going to take some of the money collected from tariffs and give it to our farmers, who for a time will be hurt until the tariffs begin to benefit them. So we’ll make sure our farmers are in good shape, because we’re collecting a lot of money,” Trump told reporters.
Political Support for the Measure
The proposal received immediate backing from Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins and House Agriculture Committee Chairman GT Thompson (R-PA). Both emphasized that the agricultural sector should not bear the burden of trade policy alone, which seeks to reposition the United States in international trade.
La primera administración Trump emitió un programa de ayuda similar para los agricultores después de que las exportaciones se desplomaran durante la anterior guerra comercial con Beijing #trump #Aranceles #Agricultores
Mira la nota👉 https://t.co/iwliMNUklh pic.twitter.com/Lk3tHXYOIf
— The Epoch Times Español (@EpochTimesEs) September 25, 2025
The plan is expected to be included in the 2026 federal spending package, which must be approved before November 21 to avoid another government shutdown. This detail is key, as the measure not only provides economic relief for farmers but also ties into the broader negotiations over budget funding and priorities.
The Debate Over Tariff Revenues
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has insisted that tariff revenues will primarily be used to pay down the national debt. In statements to CNBC in August, Bessent estimated that tariff collections could reach $300 billion this year, later revising the figure upward to $500 billion.
“We are going to reduce the deficit relative to GDP. We’ll start paying off the debt, and at that point, it can be used as compensation for the American people,” he said. Bessent’s vision contrasts with Trump’s proposal, which aims to prioritize a specific sector—the agricultural industry—as part of his political and electoral strategy.
Per NYT—and they’re right—it’s a crisis. Farmers were bailed out for $28B in Trump’s first term. This time around, who knows?
“Are we going to lose a generation of farmers because of the trade war? I think that’s what we’re fast approaching.” —Farmer Matt Sherlock. pic.twitter.com/28nyFTjHDa
— Karly Kingsley (@karlykingsley) September 15, 2025
The American heartland has historically been one of the Republican Party’s strongholds. However, Trump’s trade policies have raised concerns in farming states such as Iowa, Nebraska, and Kansas, where grain, meat, and dairy exports heavily depend on international markets like China and Mexico.
By promising an “economic bailout” funded by tariffs, Trump seeks to strengthen his bond with the agricultural sector and ensure that trade tensions do not translate into a loss of electoral support. The measure also reinforces his narrative that tariffs are not a cost to the country, but a strategic tool to strengthen the national economy and protect producers from foreign competition.
About The Author
Vanya Thais
Peruana, católica, madre de familia, periodista de investigación y activista por el TEA (transtorno de espectro autista). Actualmente es Editora General de votocatolico.org, un portal político para hispanos católicos en Estados Unidos.
Es conocida por defender la vida y la familia. Ha sido panelista en medios nacionales e internacionales como analista política. Profesional de la universidad San Martin de Porres en Periodismo, y es columnista nacional e internacional (México y España), defendiendo siempre la familia y el estado de derecho.
Brinda capacitaciones con el taller «femeninas y poderosas» a mujeres de sectores emergentes para que aprendan a ser autónomas y emprender. Por su corte de investigación, da clases sobre el origen de la guerrilla en el Perú, la época del terrorismo y la relación actual con el sector socialista más corrupto de la política peruana.