“Utterly Trash”: Jasmine Crockett Calls for EXPANDING the Supreme Court in UNHINGED Rant (VIDEO)
WATCH: “Utterly Trash”: Jasmine Crockett Calls for EXPANDING the Supreme Court in UNHINGED Rant
Rep. Jasmine Crockett used a town hall this week with Menefee for Congress to deliver one of the most aggressive attacks on the Supreme Court in recent memory, calling the institution “utterly trash” and demanding that Democrats expand it.
The event took place in Texas and was intended to cover redistricting and election issues, but Crockett quickly turned it into a pitch for court-packing legislation.
She said she already has “a number of bills” prepared and complained that she only needs more Democrats to help her pass them.
Her remarks confirmed a trend that has been building inside the Democrat Party for years and placed her alongside figures such as Adam Schiff, Elizabeth Warren, and other prominent Democrats who have embraced court expansion as a routine talking point.
Crockett told attendees that the Court needs “reform ASAP,” arguing that expansion is necessary because the current Court does not consistently deliver outcomes aligned with Democrat policy goals.
She did not offer a constitutional argument but instead focused on the Court’s refusal to act in ways she supports.
Her comments at the local event showed how normalized the idea of court-packing has become within the Democrat grassroots.
What began as a fringe proposal after the confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett has now become a mainstream position among national Democrats, and Crockett’s remarks demonstrated the party’s growing comfort with reshaping the judiciary whenever it loses key cases.
She then shifted into a long and confusing retelling of a 2021 Texas redistricting lawsuit, accusing state officials of racial motives while repeatedly asserting that their strategy was designed to dilute minority voting power.
Crockett emphasized her personal role in the case, describing courtroom exchanges and claiming that state attorneys underestimated her intelligence because they “watched too much Fox News.”
Her explanation relied on numerical claims that did not hold together, including the idea that 39% of Texans would end up selecting more than 70% of congressional seats.
She concluded that the maps were racist based on that math alone, ignoring the broader legal and demographic context.
Crockett also argued that shifting deadlines, map changes, and filing uncertainty amount to voter suppression, claiming that confusion itself harms minority voters.
She blamed Republicans, state judges, and the Supreme Court for a lengthy litigation timeline, insisting that the Court’s reluctance to intervene immediately is evidence of partisan intent.
Her argument ended with a warning that without immediate action the fight could continue for years.
The theme of the town hall was unmistakable.
Crockett did not argue for an impartial Supreme Court. She argued for a Supreme Court that supports Democrat policy preferences, and when it does not, she labels it “trash” and demands expansion.
By aligning herself with Democrats like Schiff and Warren, Crockett made clear that court-packing is no longer a fringe position but a central goal for her party.
You can email Gregory Lyakhov here, and read more of Gregory Lyakhov’s articles here.
Dear Reader – The enemies of freedom are choking off the Gateway Pundit from the resources we need to bring you the truth. Since many asked for it, we now have a way for you to support The Gateway Pundit directly – and get ad-reduced access. Plus, there are goodies like a special Gateway Pundit coffee mug for supporters at a higher level. You can see all the options by clicking here – thank you for your support!